Back to competency map

Clinical competency

Suicide and serious psychiatric risk assessment

Teaches structured assessment of suicidal ideation, intent, psychiatric deterioration, and related high-risk presentations. Learners are trained to use appropriate tools, safety planning, emergency contacts, clinician access, and escalation pathways when risk is identified.

Mixed evidenceModern clinical

Looking for something specific? Ask Blossom

Guidelines

41

Courses

1

Providers

1

Protocols

6

Classification

Source quality

Course pageLab manualProtocol paperTrial supplement

Also known as

Baseline symptom and suicidality screeningMonitor suicidality and risk over timeMonitoring distress, suicidality, and destabilizationRisk assessment for suicidality and mental state deteriorationRisk assessment for suicidality and psychiatric deteriorationSafety monitoring for suicidalitySuicidality and psychiatric risk assessment awarenessSuicidality assessmentSuicidality assessment and escalationSuicidality assessment and psychiatric risk awarenessSuicidality assessment awareness and escalationSuicidality evaluation and monitoringSuicidality monitoringSuicidality risk assessment and monitoringSuicide and homicide risk assessmentSuicide and risk screeningSuicide risk assessmentSuicide risk assessment and crisis interventionSuicide risk assessment and escalationSuicide risk assessment and managementSuicide risk assessment and responseSuicide risk identification and responseSuicide risk managementSuicide risk recognition and responseSuicide risk screening and responseSuicide risk vigilance and escalationSuicide-risk awarenessUse of suicidality tools

Across the manuals

Across the manuals, suicide and serious psychiatric risk assessment is treated as a core safety function, with repeated monitoring of suicidal ideation, intent, behaviour, and broader mental state before, during, and after treatment. The sources converge on structured use of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale, often alongside clinical judgment, narrative interview, and follow-up contacts. Several manuals also link risk monitoring to concrete escalation routes, including urgent psychiatric assessment, emergency department referral, EMS, hospitalization, withdrawal from study, and documentation or reporting of adverse events. The manuals differ mainly in how they operationalise monitoring and escalation. Some specify frequent scheduled checks, such as screening, baseline, dosing, washout, integration, follow-up, or weekly remote contacts, while others emphasise continuous vigilance during sessions and post-session destabilisation. A few sources add extra safety steps such as daily telephone contact, 24-hour phone availability, emergency contact collection, caregiver or family involvement, or private follow-up by phone or video. They also differ in the exact thresholds for action, with some distinguishing passive ideation from active ideation with plan or intent, and others explicitly naming exclusion criteria, withdrawal, or immediate hospital-level care when risk becomes imminent.

In practice

What it looks like on the ground

  • Repeatedly checks suicidal ideation, intent, plan, and behaviour across study contacts
  • Escalates positive suicide-risk findings to the PI, physician investigator, or psychiatrist
  • Uses private follow-up assessment by phone or video when suicidality is suspected
  • Documents and reports suicide-related adverse events or serious adverse events

Assessment signals in the sources

Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating ScaleC-SSRSMADRS suicidal thoughts itemBeck Scale for Suicide Ideation

Synthesised from the linked source documents; refreshed as the library updates.

Linked sources

The guidelines, courses, and providers that evidence this competency. Full lists are a Blossom Pro feature.

Linked guidelines (41)

Unlock every linked source

See all linked guidelines, courses, and providers behind this competency, plus the full competency graph.